File locking is supported in WebDAV Drive Mapping and DriveHQ FileManager.įile Versioning is supported across all DriveHQ services.ĭriveHQ WebDAV service supports HTTPS/SSL data communication between the server and client is encrypted.įor businesses with many users/computers, WebDAV Drive Mapping (Cloud File Server) service It wastes a lot of storage spaceįile Locking will prevent users from editingĪ file that is being worked on by another user. It is very inefficient as your data needs to be synced to many devices. For businesses with many users/computers, ![]() Dropbox, Google Drive, OneDrive and iCloud).Ĭloud folder sync service is convenient for consumers. That are based on cloud folder synchronization (e.g. WebDAV Drive Mapping/Cloud File Server is also more scalable than other cloud storage services Our WebDAV drive is many times faster and more reliable than Performance, scalability and reliabilityĭriveHQ's Cloud Drive Mapping Tool includes a local caching server.All files are stored in the same virtual file server that canīe accessed from anywhere. You can share folders to sub-users, subgroups, contact groups, standalone DriveHQ members or even non-DriveHQ users.ĭifferent users can be set with different permissions. Or save an attachment to the cloud drive. Mapping a drive will allow you to directly edit & save Cloud files, attach files to an Outlook email, Is the easiest way of accessing your cloud storage. You can access your cloud files as if they are on your local hard drive. > If you selected a suitable WebDAV server, WebDAV should should has merit over FTP.WebDAV Drive Mapping / Cloud File Server Tutorial May be Apache server is more flexible than IIS WebDAV. ![]() >I do not recommend to use IIS WebDAV, because it does not support PROPPATCH command to copy the last-modified time to the upload file, and its PROPFIND command does not contains customized meta-data when list files. Because WebDAV need not to create an extra data transfer thread, this saves the CPU consumption and resource usage. >BestSync WebDAV supports multiple threads and concurrent file upload/download also, its speed is fast, may be faster than FTP. But many WebDAV servers (include "Windows 7 native WebDAV") do not support command for copying last modified time-stamp to the uploaded file and list the last-modified time of files in one command, this makes WebDAV not efficient for synchronizing among PCs. WebDAV uses only one HTTP port, but FTP protocol uses 1 control port and a n extra data port, furthermore, each download/upload transfer may use a different data port.īut BestSync FTP feature has been tested with many FTP servers, and supports all the commands (MFMT, MDTM, Site UTIME) for copying last modified time-stamp to the uploaded file. WEbDAV is more firewall friendly than FTP. ![]() >BestSync/FTP and BestSync/WebDAV should have the same robustness. Here are the answers of your questions about FTP vs WebDAV: Will BestSync work well with Windows 7 native WebDAV? Or, do you recommend some other WebDAV host software?Ĥ) In general, are there any downsides to switching from BestSync/FTP to BestSync/WebDAV? Is BestSync/FTP faster or slower than BestSync/WebDAV?ģ) I'm considering setting up WebDAV on a Windows 7 Pro 圆4 machine using the WebDAV built-in to the native IIS (for example see this URL: ). I have some questions about BestSync, FTP, and WebDAV:ġ) How does the robustness of BestSync/FTP compare to BestSync/WebDAV? Does BestSync/WebDAV work at least as well as BestSync/FTP as far as error-free syncs, file time-stamping, NTFS file permissions/properties, and over sync robustness?Ģ) How does the speed of BestSync/FTP compare to BestSync/WebDAV? FYI, with BestSync/FTP I'm currently using 10 threads / concurrent file copies on each task. I'm considering switching from an FTP server to WebDAV: I'm currently using BestSync to sync two computers (2-way sync) through an FTP server:
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |